Computational Evidence That Frequency Trajectory Theory Does Not Oppose But Emerges From Age‐of‐Acquisition Theory
Cognitive Science 36 (8):1499-1531 (2012)
According to the age-of-acquisition hypothesis, words acquired early in life are processed faster and more accurately than words acquired later. Connectionist models have begun to explore the influence of the age/order of acquisition of items (and also their frequency of encounter). This study attempts to reconcile two different methodological and theoretical approaches (proposed by Lambon Ralph & Ehsan, 2006 and Zevin & Seidenberg, 2002) to age-limited learning effects. The current simulations extend the findings reported by Zevin and Seidenberg (2002) that have shown that frequency trajectories (FTs) have limited and specific effects on word-reading tasks. Using the methodological framework proposed by Lambon Ralph and Ehsan (2006), which makes it possible to compare word-reading and picture-naming tasks in connectionist networks, we were able to show that FT has a considerable influence on age-limited learning effects in a picture naming task. The findings show that when the input–output mappings are arbitrary (simulating picture naming tasks), the links formed by the network become entrenched as a result of early experience and that subsequent variations in frequency of exposure of the items have only a minor impact. In contrast, when the mappings between input-output are quasi-systematic or systematic (simulating word-reading tasks), the training of new items was generalized and resulted in the suppression of age-limited learning effects. At a theoretical level, we suggest that FT, which simultaneously takes account of time and the level of exposure across time, represents a more precise and modulated measure compared with the order of introduction of the items and may lead to innovative hypotheses in the field of age-limited learning effects
|Keywords||Quasi‐systematic/systematic mappings Arbitrary mappings Age of acquisition Frequency trajectory|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
A Theory of Lexical Access in Speech Production.Willem J. M. Levelt, Ardi Roelofs & Antje S. Meyer - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):1-38.
Catastrophic Forgetting in Connectionist Networks.R. French - 1999 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3 (4):128-135.
Neural Computation as a Tool to Differentiate Perceptual From Emotional Processes: The Case of Anger Superiority Effect.Martial Mermillod, Nicolas Vermeulen, Daniel Lundqvist & Paula M. Niedenthal - 2009 - Cognition 110 (3):346-357.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Old Ideas, New Mistakes: All Learning is Relational.Stellan Ohlsson - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):79-80.
Using Variability to Guide Dimensional Weighting: Associative Mechanisms in Early Word Learning.Keith S. Apfelbaum & Bob McMurray - 2011 - Cognitive Science 35 (6):1105-1138.
Tracking the Time Course of Word‐Frequency Effects in Auditory Word Recognition With Event‐Related Potentials.Sophie Dufour, Angèle Brunellière & Ulrich H. Frauenfelder - 2013 - Cognitive Science 37 (3):489-507.
Okay for Content Words, but What About Functional Items?Derek Bickerton - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (6):1104-1105.
Statistical Learning Is Related to Reading Ability in Children and Adults.Joanne Arciuli & Ian C. Simpson - 2012 - Cognitive Science 36 (2):286-304.
Complexity in Language Acquisition.Alexander Clark & Shalom Lappin - 2013 - Topics in Cognitive Science 5 (1):89-110.
Probability Learning, Event-Splitting Effects and the Economic Theory of Choice.Steven J. Humphrey - 1999 - Theory and Decision 46 (1):51-78.
iMinerva: A Mathematical Model of Distributional Statistical Learning.Erik D. Thiessen & Philip I. Pavlik - 2013 - Cognitive Science 37 (2):310-343.
Why Theories of Word Learning Don't Always Work as Theories of Verb Learning.Letitia R. Naigles - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (6):1113-1114.
The Modulation of Visual and Task Characteristics of a Writing System on Hemispheric Lateralization in Visual Word Recognition—A Computational Exploration.Janet H. Hsiao & Sze Man Lam - 2013 - Cognitive Science 37 (5):861-890.
Which Came First: Infants Learning Language or Motherese?Heather Bortfeld - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (4):505-506.
Who Achiveves Level 2 Qualifications During Adulthood? Evidence From the NCDS.Ricardo Sabates, Leon Feinstein & Eleni Skaliotis - 2007 - British Journal of Educational Studies 55 (4):390 - 408.
Contextual Vocabulary Acquisition: A Computational Theory and Educational Curriculum.William J. Rapaport & Michael W. Kibby - 2002 - In Nagib Callaos, Ana Breda & Ma Yolanda Fernandez J. (eds.), Proceedings of the 6th World Multiconference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics. International Institute of Informatics and Systemics.
Added to index2012-09-18
Total downloads20 ( #244,788 of 2,158,296 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #355,837 of 2,158,296 )
How can I increase my downloads?