Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh (2004)

Authors
Melissa M Merritt
University of New South Wales
Abstract
Kant advertises his Critique of Pure Reason as fulfilling reason's "most difficult" task: self-knowledge. As it is carried out in the Critique, this investigation is meant to be "scientific and fully illuminating"; for Kant, this means that it must follow a proper method. Commentators writing in English have tended to dismiss Kant's claim that the Critique is the scientific expression of reason's self-knowledge---either taking it to be sheer rhetoric, or worrying that it pollutes the Critique with an unfortunate residue of rationalism. As a result, there is little sustained treatment of the method of the Critique in the secondary literature. Since Kant holds that the substantive insights of critical philosophy are not separable from the methodological context in which they come to light, this is a serious mistake. My dissertation corrects for this, by approaching the Critique through an examination of its method. In doing so, it yields a reading of the Transcendental Deduction that not only promises to resolve current debates about its "proof structure", but also fully accounts for the Deduction's pivotal role in the work as a whole
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,047
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Individualism and Self-Knowledge.Tyler Burge - 1988 - Journal of Philosophy 85 (November):649-63.
Our Entitlement to Self-Knowledge.Tyler Burge - 1996 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 96 (1):91-116.
What Does It Mean to Say That Logic is Formal?John MacFarlane - 2000 - Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh

View all 37 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Origins of Kant's "Critique of Judgment".Ted Kinnaman - 1995 - Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin - Madison
Kant's Concept of Reflective Judgment.Sumangali Rajiva - 1999 - Dissertation, University of Toronto (Canada)
Critique of Pure Reason.Immanuel Kant - 1991 - In Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Blackwell. pp. 449-451.
The Regulative Ideal of Systematicity in Kant's Critical Philosophy.Md Abdul Muhit - 1997 - Dissertation, The University of Western Ontario (Canada)
Kant's Metaphysics of the Self.Colin Marshall - 2010 - Philosophers' Imprint 10:1-21.
Kant and the Discipline of Reason.Brian A. Chance - 2016 - European Journal of Philosophy 24 (2):87-110.
Kant's Critique of Pure Reason: Critical Essays.Patricia Kitcher (ed.) - 1998 - Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-02-05

Total views
21 ( #470,387 of 2,344,277 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #513,994 of 2,344,277 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes