Did we describe what you meant? Findings and methodological discussion of an empirical validation study for a systematic review of reasons

BMC Medical Ethics 15 (1):69 (2014)

Abstract
The systematic review of reasons is a new way to obtain comprehensive information about specific ethical topics. One such review was carried out for the question of why post-trial access to trial drugs should or need not be provided. The objective of this study was to empirically validate this review using an author check method. The article also reports on methodological challenges faced by our study
Keywords Systematic review of reason  Systematic review  Methodology  Medical ethics  Bioethics  Empirical ethics  Post-trial access
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1186/1472-6939-15-69
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 45,328
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

How to Write a Systematic Review of Reasons.D. Strech & N. Sofaer - 2012 - Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (2):121-126.
Systematic Reviews of Empirical Bioethics.D. Strech, M. Synofzik & G. Marckmann - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (6):472-477.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Systematic Reviews of Empirical Bioethics.D. Strech, M. Synofzik & G. Marckmann - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (6):472-477.
How to Write a Systematic Review of Reasons.D. Strech & N. Sofaer - 2012 - Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (2):121-126.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-09-28

Total views
20 ( #451,575 of 2,280,310 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #831,075 of 2,280,310 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature