In Peter Thielke (ed.), Kant's Prolegomena: A Critical Guide. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. pp. 9-26 (2021)

Authors
Melissa M Merritt
University of New South Wales
Abstract
Kant’s Prolegomena is a piece of philosophical advertising: it exists to convince the open-minded “future teacher” of metaphysics that the true critical philosophy — i.e., the Critique — provides the only viable solution to the problem of metaphysics (i.e. its failure to make any genuine progress). To be effective, a piece of advertising needs to know its audience. This chapter argues that Kant takes his reader to have some default sympathies for the common-sense challenge to metaphysics originating from Thomas Reid and his followers; this fact in turn explains his rhetorical strategies in the Prolegomena, particularly regarding the presentation of the problem of metaphysics. The chapter draws attention to the importance of Shaftesbury, who, with a nod to Horace, had argued for the deployment of humour to disarm fraudulent claims to epistemic and moral authority. Kant looks to Horace himself to poke fun at the common-sense challenge to metaphysics, and from there to indicate the general shape of the particular argumentative strategies of the Critique — that project that alone, in his view, can promise some kind of future for metaphysics.
Keywords Kant  Prolegomena  Thomas Reid  Scottish common-sense philosophy  Christian Garve  Shaftesbury  Horace  enlightenment  sapere aude
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on Amazon.com
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding.David Hume - 1955 - In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Exploring Philosophy: An Introductory Anthology. Oxford University Press. pp. 112.
Kant on Reflection and Virtue.Melissa Merritt - 2018 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Scottish Philosophy of Common Sense.S. A. Grave - 1960 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Reid on Ridicule and Common Sense.Giovanni B. Grandi - 2008 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 6 (1):71-90.
Common Sense in the Scottish Enlightenment Ed. By Charles Bradford Bow.Jenny Keefe - 2019 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 57 (3):560-561.
A Return to Common Sense: Restorationism and Common Sense Epistemology.Blake McAllister - 2019 - In J. Caleb Clanton (ed.), Restoration & Philosophy. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Press. pp. 35-78.
Wolterstorff on Reid’s Notion of Common Sense.Petr Glombíček - 2020 - Studia Neoaristotelica 17 (2):221-238.
Common Sense.Michael De Medeiros - 2009 - Weigl Publishers.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-10-20

Total views
41 ( #266,860 of 2,462,307 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
41 ( #21,567 of 2,462,307 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes