Kant on the Pleasures of Understanding

In Alix Cohen (ed.), Kant on Emotion and Value. Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 126-145 (2014)
Abstract
Why did Kant write the Critique of Judgment, and why did he say that his analysis of the judgment of taste — his technical term for our enjoyment of beauty — is the most important part of it? Kant claims that his analysis of taste “reveals a property of our faculty of cognition that without this analysis would have remained unknown” (KU §8, 5:213). The clue lies in Kant’s view that while taste is an aesthetic, and non-cognitive, mode of judgment, it nevertheless involves the “free play” of cognitive capacities that is pleasurable in some way that ordinary cognitive business is not. My thesis is that the judgment of taste reveals a pleasure that is not usually apparent when we understand something in particular, but which is nevertheless proper to the activity of understanding as such. This matters, I argue, because in this way the judgment of taste points to a standard of cognitive virtue.
Keywords Kant  taste  epistemic virtue  normative epistemology
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Consciousness as Inner Sensation: Crusius and Kant.Jonas Jervell Indregard - forthcoming - Ergo, an Open Access Journal of Philosophy.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Kant's Theory of Judgment, and Judgments of Taste: On Henry Allison's "Kant's Theory of Taste".Béatrice Longuenesse - 2003 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 46 (2):143 – 163.
What is Claimed in a Kantian Judgment of Taste?Miles Rind - 2000 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 38 (1):63-85.
Kant and the Pleasure of “Mere Reflection”.Melissa Zinkin - 2012 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 55 (5):433-453.
Eine andere Art von Gefühl der Lust beim Kantischen Geschmacksurteil.Hye-Jin Lee - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 16:283-291.
Can Kants Deduction of Judgments of Taste Be Saved?Miles Rind - 2002 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 84 (1):20-45.
The Subjective Basis of Kant's Judgment of Taste.Brian Watkins - 2011 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 54 (4):315-336.
Kant and the Claims of Taste.Paul Guyer - 1979 - Cambridge University Press.
Kant's Aesthetics and the `Empty Cognitive Stock'.Christopher Janaway - 1997 - Philosophical Quarterly 47 (189):459-476.
Added to PP index
2014-06-12

Total downloads
114 ( #44,602 of 2,193,091 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #33,576 of 2,193,091 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature