The force of dissimilar analogies in bioethics

Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 32 (2):117-128 (2011)

Authors
Guido Pennings
University of Ghent
Abstract
Although analogical reasoning has long been a popular method of reasoning in bioethics, current literature does not sufficiently grasp its variety. We assert that the main shortcoming is the fact that an analogy's value is often judged on the extent of similarity between the source situation and the target situation, while in (bio)ethics, analogies are often used because of certain dissimilarities rather than in spite of them. We make a clear distinction between dissimilarities that aim to reinforce a similar approach in the source situation and the target situation and dissimilarities that aim to undermine or denounce a similar approach. The former kind of dissimilarity offers the analogy more normative force than if there were no dissimilarities present; this is often overlooked by authors who regard all relevant dissimilarities as detrimental to the analogy's strength. Another observation is that an evaluation of the normative force of an analogy cannot be made independently of moral principles or theories. Without these, one cannot select which elements in an analogy are morally relevant nor determine how they should be interpreted
Keywords EGG DONORS  DONATION  STEM-CELL RESEARCH  bioethics  ethical reasoning  analogy  dissimilarity  CASUISTRY  PAYMENT  OOCYTES
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11017-010-9165-6
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 47,350
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Principles of Biomedical Ethics.Tom L. Beauchamp - 1979 - Oxford University Press.
Getting Down to Cases: The Revival of Casuistry in Bioethics.John Arras - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (1):29-51.

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Banking on the Value of Analogies in Bioethics.Lawrence Burns - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (6):63-65.
Multiple Analogies in Archaeology.Cameron Shelley - 1999 - Philosophy of Science 66 (4):579-605.
Mapping Metaphors and Analogies.José J. López - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (6):61-63.
Harm, Risk, and Doping Analogies: A Counter-Response to Kious.Oskar MacGregor & Mike McNamee - 2011 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 32 (3):201-207.
Informing Consent: Analogies to History-Taking.Carmen Paradis - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (1):24 – 26.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-08-28

Total views
42 ( #216,386 of 2,291,079 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #580,277 of 2,291,079 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature