Taste and Acquaintance

Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 73 (2):127-139 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The analogy between gustatory taste and critical or aesthetic taste plays a recurring role in the history of aesthetics. Our interest in this article is in a particular way in which gustatory judgments are frequently thought to be analogous to critical judgments. It appears obvious to many that to know how a particular object tastes we must have tasted it for ourselves; the proof of the pudding, we are all told, is in the eating. And it has seemed just as obvious to many philosophers that aesthetic judgment requires first-person experience. In this article we argue that, despite its initial appeal, the claim that gustatory and critical judgments are analogous in this way is mistaken. The two sorts of judgments are, as a matter of fact, similar in their epistemology, but earlier theorists have got things entirely backward—neither gustatory judgment nor aesthetic judgment requires first-hand acquaintance with their objects. Our particular focus in this article is on arguing that first-person experience is not required to know how an item of food or drink tastes. In fact, there are a wide variety of ways in which we can acquire this knowledge

Similar books and articles

The objectivity of aesthetic judgements.M. W. Rowe - 1999 - British Journal of Aesthetics 39 (1):40-52.
Kant's theory of judgment, and judgments of taste: On Henry Allison's "Kant's theory of taste".Béatrice Longuenesse - 2003 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 46 (2):143 – 163.
What is claimed in a Kantian judgment of taste?Miles Rind - 2000 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 38 (1):63-85.
Can kants deduction of judgments of taste be saved?Miles Rind - 2002 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 84 (1):20-45.
Productive Excess: Aesthetic Ideas, Silence, and Community.Erin Bradfield - 2014 - Journal of Aesthetic Education 48 (2):1-15.
On the Old Saw “I know nothing about art but I know what I like".Kevin Melchionne - 2010 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 68 (2):131-141.
The Role of Taste in Morality: From Kant to Schiller to Emerson.Jeffrey Brian Downard - 2001 - Dissertation, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-24

Downloads
491 (#32,879)

6 months
80 (#47,311)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Aaron Meskin
University of Georgia

Citations of this work

Absolutely tasty: an examination of predicates of personal taste and faultless disagreement.Jeremy Wyatt - 2018 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 61 (3):252-280.
Knowledge of things and aesthetic testimony.Chris Ranalli - forthcoming - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Epiphenomenal qualia.Frank Jackson - 1982 - Philosophical Quarterly 32 (April):127-136.
What experience teaches.David K. Lewis - 1990 - In William G. Lycan (ed.), Mind and Cognition. Blackwell. pp. 29--57.
Of the standard of taste.David Hume - 1757 - In Essays Moral, Political, and Literary. Libertyclassics (1987). pp. 226-249.
How to Be a Pessimist about Aesthetic Testimony.Robert Hopkins - 2011 - Journal of Philosophy 108 (3):138-157.
Context, content, and relativism.Michael Glanzberg - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 136 (1):1--29.

View all 19 references / Add more references