The constitution’s standing as a legal act of the highest power not only ensures its exclusive status in the legal system but also determines the hierarchic certainty of all norms within that system. The explicit character of the constitution does not preclude it from ensuring the hierarchical functionality of the legal system. This latter function requires that the limitation “problem” of explicitness be addressed by interpreting the constitution as a systemic document. Applying the constitution, therefore, requires a continuous effort in comprehending it. The official doctrine of constitutional judicial institutions reflects the standard for understanding the constitution. This standard becomes the sole source, not only de jure, but significantly de facto, for determining the legality of legal acts. The constitution, as the prime and foremost law in a country, determines the functionality of the entire system of legal norms. As a legal source, it takes on the role of the material arbiter of final legality. The constant need to ensure the functioning of the system of legal norms hence informs yet another necessity–to apprehend and understand the constitution and the norms and principles established within. A few factors induce this perpetual need for interpretation, those being (a) the abstractness of constitutional norms, (b) “competition” among constitutional norms, (c) the integral and systemic nature of the constitution, and (d) the problem of legislative/regulative omission in the constitution
Keywords teisės normų sistema  konstitucijos omisija  constitutional omission  interpretacija  konstitucija  konstitucinė jurisprudencija  democracy  constitutional jurisprudence  constitution  mokslinė doktrina  interpretation
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,360
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Problematics of Moral and Legal Theory.Richard A. Posner - 1999 - The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Constitutional Foundations of the Financial System of the State of Lithuania.Dalia Vasarienė - 2012 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 19 (3):987-1003.
The Features of the Mexican Constitution.Elena Vaitiekienė - 2009 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 115 (1):89-121.
The Problems of Correction of the Official Constitutional Doctrine.Egidijus Jarašiūnas - 2009 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 115 (1):39-70.
Autonomous Constitutional Interpretation.Tomasz Stawecki - 2012 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 25 (4):505-535.
Impact of Constitutional Justice on Lithuaniaʼs Civil Procedure.Egidija Stauskienė - 2012 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 19 (3):1079-1099.
The Concept of Family in Lithuanian Law.Gediminas Sagatys - 2010 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 119 (1):181-196.


Added to PP index

Total views
23 ( #473,012 of 2,448,855 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #223,910 of 2,448,855 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes