Ownership of the product of living things, such as human tissue or cultures developed from human cells, is difficult for the law to determine. Civilian jurisdictions, with their legal heritage grounded in Roman law, offer one solution. Civilian jurisdictions would resolve such cases under the rules of specificatio (specification). A recent case from the Outer House of the Scottish Court of Session (Kinloch Damph Ltd v Nordvik Salmon Farms Ltd) addresses the problem. The case was properly decided, though the grounds of the decision could be improved. Specifically, on civil law principles, civilian courts ought to award ownership of a living thing to a maker/manufacturer who has altered the living thing's natural pattern of development
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
On the Unity of Compound Things: Living and Non-Living.Joshua Hoffman & Gary S. Rosenkrantz - 1998 - Ratio 11 (3):289–315.
Der fortbestand Von lebewesen.Boris Hennig - 2007 - Allgemeine Zeitschrift für Philosophie 32 (1):81-91.
Varieties of Living Things: Life at the Intersection of Lineage and Metabolism.John Dupré & Maureen O'malley - 2009 - Philosophy & Theory in Biology 1 (20130604).
Living Things as Hierarchically Organized Structures.Uko Zylstra - 1992 - Synthese 91 (1-2):111 - 133.
The Limits of the Explanatory Power of Developmentalism.David Sobel - 2010 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 7 (4):517-527.
What is Structural Similarity and is It Greater in Living Things?Keith R. Laws - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):486-487.
Is Artefactualness a Value-Relevant Property of Living Things?Ronald Sandler - 2012 - Synthese 185 (1):89-102.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads2 ( #757,320 of 2,152,479 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #399,782 of 2,152,479 )
How can I increase my downloads?