South African Journal of Science 116 (7/8) (forthcoming)

Authors
Thaddeus Metz
University of Johannesburg
Abstract
A short reflection on respects in which philosophers are particularly, if not uniquely, well positioned to address certain ethical and epistemological controversies pertaining to the coronavirus.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,488
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Chinese Bioethicists Speak Out on Covid‐19, and Others Follow.Susan Gilbert - 2020 - Hastings Center Report 50 (2):inside_front_cover-inside_front_.
Experiencing Community in a Covid Surge.Debjani Mukherjee - 2020 - Hastings Center Report 50 (3):10-11.
Vietnam’s Low-Cost COVID-19 Strategy.Hong-Kong Nguyen - 2020 - Project Syndicate 2020 (4):1-6.
Champions in the Age of COVID-19.Jake Wojtowicz & Alex Wolf-Root - forthcoming - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy:1-11.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-06-02

Total views
9 ( #849,040 of 2,326,561 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #72,806 of 2,326,561 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes