Intimacy Without Proximity: Encountering Griz as a Companion Species

Environmental Philosophy 5 (2):99-128 (2008)
Using grizzly-human encounters as a case study, this paper argues for a rethinking of the differences between humans and animals within en- vironmental ethics. A diffractive approach that understands such dif- ferences as an effect of specific material and discursive arrangements would see ethics as an interrogation of which arrangements enable flourishing, or living and dying well. The paper draws on a wide variety of human-grizzly encoun- ters in order to describe the species as co-constitutive and challenges perspectives that treat bears and other animals as oppositional and non- agential outsides to humans. -/-.
Keywords Animal Studies  Science Studies  Environmental Philosophy  Environmental Ethics  Grizzly Bear
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/envirophil20085212
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive Jacob Metcalf, Intimacy Without Proximity: Encountering Griz as a Companion Species
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Lauren Harding (2014). What Good Is a Bear to Society? Society and Animals 22 (2):174-193.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

193 ( #20,290 of 1,925,045 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

20 ( #26,932 of 1,925,045 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.