Ramsey, ‘Universals’ and atomic propositions


Authors
Steven Methven
Oxford University
Abstract
ABSTRACTIn ‘Universals’, Ramsey declares that we do not, and cannot, know the forms of atomic propositions. A year later, in a symposium with Braithwaite and Joseph, he announces a change of mind: atomic propositions may, after all, be discoverable by analysis. It is clear from the 1926 paper that Ramsey intends this to be a revision of the 1925 claim. Puzzlingly, however, Ramsey does not mention analysis in 1925. My task in this article is to provide a justification for that change of mind. My argument consists of two parts. I first show what relation holds between the negative 1925 assertion and the more positive 1926 assertion which allows us to read the latter claim as a retraction of the former, as Ramsey appears to have intended it. Then I shall argue that the retraction of the 1925 claim is forced upon Ramsey by reflection on the fact that three theses, all of which he held in or around the relevant period, are, rather surprisingly, revealed to be inconsistent.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1080/09608788.2018.1477731
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 38,928
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Tractatus logico-philosophicus.Ludwig Wittgenstein - 2004 - Filosoficky Casopis 52:336-341.
Externalist Theories of Empirical Knowledge.Laurence BonJour - 1980 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 5 (1):53-73.
Was He Trying to Whistle It?Peter Ms Hacker - 2000 - In Alice Crary & Rupert J. Read (eds.), The New Wittgenstein. Routledge.
Universals.F. P. Ramsey - 1925 - Mind 34 (136):401-417.
Principia Mathematica.A. N. Whitehead & B. Russell - 1931 - Erkenntnis 2:73-75.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Ramsey, Particulars, and Universals.Peter Simons - 1991 - Theoria 57 (3):150-161.
Ramsey on Universals.Fraser MacBride - 2005 - In Hallvard Lillehammer & D. H. Mellor (eds.), Ramsey's Legacy. Oxford University Press.
Ramsey and Russell on Facts and Forms.Herbert Hochberg - 2006 - Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy 9.
The Problem of Universals.Charles Landesman - 1971 - New York: Basic Books.
Ramsey's Pragmatism.Claudine Tiercelin - 2004 - Dialectica 58 (4):529–547.
Ramsey's Pragmatism.Claudine Tiercelin - 2004 - Dialectica 58 (4):529-547.
What's in a Name: A Response to Ramsey.Andrew Parisi - 2017 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 6 (4):268-277.
Where Are Particulars and Universals?Fraser MacBride - 1998 - Dialectica 52 (3):203–227.
Nils-Eric Sahlin, Ed., Ramsey's Ontology. [REVIEW]Matteo Morganti - 2005 - Philosophy in Review 25 (5):380-382.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-08-03

Total views
6 ( #800,436 of 2,319,058 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #214,605 of 2,319,058 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature