Cosmos and History 14 (2):157-177 (2018)

Authors
Abstract
The need for revolution in modern physics is a well known and often broached subject, however, the precision and success of current models narrows the possible changes to such a great degree that there appears to be no major change possible. We provide herein, the first step toward a possible solution to this paradox via reinterpretation of the conceptual-theoretical framework while still preserving the modern art and tools in an unaltered form. This redivision of concepts and redistribution of the data can revolutionize expectations of new experimental outcomes. This major change within finely tuned constraints is made possible by the fact that numerous mathematically equivalent theories were direct precursors to, and contemporaneous with, the modern interpretations. In this first of a series of papers, historical investigation of the conceptual lineage of modern theory reveals points of exacting overlap in physical theories which, while now considered cross discipline, originally split from a common source and can be reintegrated as a singular science again. This revival of an an older associative hierarchy, combined with modern insights, can open new avenues for investigation. This reintegration cross-disciplinary theories and tools is defined as the “Neoclassical Interpretation.”
Keywords Classical Electromagnetism  Hydrodynamic Quantum Analogs  Fluid Models of Spacetime  Sociology of Scientific Revolution  Neoclassical Interpretation
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Problem of Interpretation of Modern Physics.Peter Mittelstaedt - 2011 - Foundations of Physics 41 (11):1667-1676.
Nonseparability, Classical, and Quantum.Wayne C. Myrvold - 2011 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62 (2):417-432.
Why Did the New Physics Force Out the Old?Rinat M. Nugayev - 1996 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 10 (2):127 – 140.
Consistent Histories of Systems and Measurements in Spacetime.Ed Seidewitz - 2011 - Foundations of Physics 41 (7):1163-1192.
“Ist Die Quantenphysik Vollständig?”.Holm Tetens - 1986 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 17 (1):96-118.
"Ist die Quantenphysik vollständig?" Ein Plädoyer, die Kopenhagener Deutung der Quantenmechanik nicht realistisch-ontologisch zu interpretieren.Holm Tetens - 1986 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 17 (1):96-118.
The Quantum Epoché.Paavo Pylkkänen - 2015 - Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology 119:332-340.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-03-18

Total views
98 ( #109,809 of 2,448,888 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
20 ( #34,459 of 2,448,888 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes