Cham, Switzerland: Springer Verlag (2015)

How do Dutch people let each other know that they disagree? What do they say when they want to resolve their difference of opinion by way of an argumentative discussion? In what way do they convey that they are convinced by each other’s argumentation? How do they criticize each other’s argumentative moves? Which words and expressions do they use in these endeavors? By answering these questions this short essay provides a brief inventory of the language of argumentation in Dutch
Keywords ad baculum fallacies
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy this book Find it on
ISBN(s) 9783319209548   331920954X   9783319209555
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-20955-5
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,231
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
Chapters BETA

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
9 ( #954,417 of 2,518,494 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,186 of 2,518,494 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes