Australian bills of rights are confined to the protection of civil and political rights. Economic, social and cultural rights were deliberately excluded from their coverage. This article draws on United Kingdom, Canadian and South African judgments with the aim of showing that the equality guarantees contained in these instruments can nevertheless be used as a vehicle for socio-economic claims. It further argues that there are sound moral and philosophical reasons that justify this approach.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
What is Social Equality? An Analysis of Status Equality as a Strongly Egalitarian Ideal.Carina Fourie - 2012 - Res Publica 18 (2):107-126.
Distributive and Relational Equality.C. Schemmel - 2012 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 11 (2):123-148.
When Equality Justifies Women's Subjection: Luce Irigaray's Critique of Equality and the Fathers' Rights Movement.Serene J. Khader - 2008 - Hypatia 23 (4):pp. 48-74.
From Bodo Ethics to Distributive Justice.Russell Hardin - 1999 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 2 (4):399-413.
Against Rawlsian Equality of Opportunity.Richard J. Arneson - 1999 - Philosophical Studies 93 (1):77-112.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads12 ( #376,363 of 2,168,605 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #346,836 of 2,168,605 )
How can I increase my downloads?