Extending Hartry field's instrumental account of applied mathematics to statistical mechanics

Philosophia Mathematica 17 (3):273-312 (2008)
A serious flaw in Hartry Field’s instrumental account of applied mathematics, namely that Field must overestimate the extent to which many of the structures of our mathematical theories are reflected in the physical world, underlies much of the criticism of this account. After reviewing some of this criticism, I illustrate through an examination of the prospects for extending Field’s account to classical equilibrium statistical mechanics how this flaw will prevent any significant extension of this account beyond field theories. I note in the conclusion that this diagnosis of Field’s program also points the way to modifications that may work
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2009
DOI 10.1093/philmat/nkn026
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 24,470
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
George Boolos (1985). Nominalist Platonism. Philosophical Review 94 (3):327-344.

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Maya Eddon (2013). Quantitative Properties. Philosophy Compass 8 (7):633-645.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

24 ( #198,099 of 1,925,553 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #308,489 of 1,925,553 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.