Journal of Business Ethics 160 (1):277-292 (2019)

Abstract
The commons is a concept increasingly used with the promise of creating new collective wealth. In the aftermath of the economic and financial crises, finance and money have been criticized and redesigned to serve the collective interest. In this article, we analyze three types of complementary currency systems: community currencies, inter-enterprise currencies, and cryptocurrencies. We investigate whether these systems can be considered as commons. To address this question, we use two main theoretical frameworks that are usually separate: the “new commons” in organization studies and the “common good” in business ethics. Our findings show that these monetary systems and organizations may be considered as commons under the “common good” framework since they promote the common interest by creating new communities. Nevertheless, according to the “new commons” framework, only systems relying on collective action and self-management can be said to form commons. This allows us to suggest two new categories of commons: the “social commons,” which fit into both the “new commons” and the “common good” frameworks, and the “commercial commons,” which fit the “common good” but not the “new commons” framework. This research advances a new conceptualization of the commons and of the ethical implications of CCs.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s10551-018-3923-1
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,219
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Stakeholder Theory and the Common Good.Antonio Argandoña - 1998 - Journal of Business Ethics 17 (9-10):1093-1102.

View all 21 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Tragedies Without Commons.Christopher Knapp - 2011 - Public Affairs Quarterly 25 (1):81-94.
Ethical Obligations in a Tragedy of the Commons.Baylor L. Johnson - 2003 - Environmental Values 12 (3):271-287.
The Tragedy of the Commons as an Essentially Aggregative Harm.Elizabeth Kahn - 2014 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 31 (3):223-236.
Rethinking the Commons.Ronald J. Herring - 1990 - Agriculture and Human Values 7 (2):88-104.
The Commons: A Place For No One, A Place For All.Zachary Davis - 2009 - Environment, Space, Place 1 (2):103-129.
Commons: A Place for No One, A Place for All.Zachary Davis - 2009 - Environment, Space, Place 1 (2):103-129.
No Tragedy on the Commons.Susan Jane Buck Cox - 1985 - Environmental Ethics 7 (1):49-61.
Tragedy of the Commons: The Meaning of the Metaphor.John Vandermeer - 1996 - Science and Society 60 (3):290 - 306.
The Tragedy of the Digital Commons.Gian Maria Greco & Luciano Floridi - 2004 - Ethics and Information Technology 6 (2):73-81.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-05-23

Total views
10 ( #871,939 of 2,448,426 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,843 of 2,448,426 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes