PLoS ONE 11 (15):1-14 (2020)
AbstractRelational aspects, such as involvement of donor’s relatives or friends in the decision-making on participation in a research biobank, providing relatives’ health data to researchers, or sharing research findings with relatives should be considered when reflecting on ethical aspects of research biobanks. The aim of this paper is to explore what the role of donor’s relatives and friends is in the process of becoming and being a biobank donor and which ethical issues arise in this context. We performed qualitative analysis of 40 qualitative semi-structured interviews with biobank donors and researchers. The results show that relatedness to relatives or other types of close relationships played a significant role in the donors’ motivation to be involved in a biobank, risk-benefit assessment, and decisions on sharing information on research and its results. Interviewees mentioned ethical issues in the context of sharing relatives’ health-related data for research purposes and returning research findings that may affect their relatives. We conclude that the question of what information on family members may be shared with a biobank by research participants without informed consent of those relatives, and when family members become research subjects, lacks a clear answer and detailed guidelines, especially in the context of the introduction of the European Union’s (EU) General Data Protection Regulation. Researchers in Latvia and EU face ethical questions and dilemmas about returning research results and incidental findings to donors’ relatives, and donors need more information on sharing research results with relatives in the informed consent process.
Similar books and articles
‚Mirroring‘ the Ethics of Biobanking: What Analysis of Consent Documents Can Tell Us?Serepkaite Jurate, Valuckiene Zivile & Gefenas Eugenijus - 2014 - Science and Engineering Ethics 20 (4):1-15.
Research Participants’ Perceptions and Views on Consent for Biobank Research: A Review of Empirical Data and Ethical Analysis.Flavio D'Abramo, Jan Schildmann & Jochen Vollmann - 2015 - BMC Medical Ethics 16 (1):60.
Preferences Regarding Return of Genomic Results to Relatives of Research Participants, Including After Participant Death: Empirical Results From a Cancer Biobank.Carmen Radecki Breitkopf, Gloria M. Petersen, Susan M. Wolf, Kari G. Chaffee, Marguerite E. Robinson, Deborah R. Gordon, Noralane M. Lindor & Barbara A. Koenig - 2015 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 43 (3):464-475.
Biobanking and the Abandonment of Informed Consent: An Ethical Imperative.Stephanie Solomon Cargill - 2016 - Public Health Ethics 9 (3):255-263.
Biobank Research and the Right to Privacy.Lars Øystein Ursin - 2008 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (4):267-285.
Sample and Data Sharing Barriers in Biobanking: Consent, Committees, and Compromises.Flora Colledge, Kirsten Persson, Bernice Elger & David Shaw - 2014 - Annals of Diagnostic Pathology 18 (2):78-81.
Broadening Consent--And Diluting Ethics?B. Hofmann - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (2):125-129.
What is a Biobank? Differing Definitions Among Biobank Stakeholders.David Shaw, Bernice Elger & Flora Colledge - 2014 - Clinical Genetics 85 (3):223-7.
Biobanks--When is Re-Consent Necessary?K. S. Steinsbekk & B. Solberg - 2011 - Public Health Ethics 4 (3):236-250.
Returning a Research Participant's Genomic Results to Relatives: Perspectives From Managers of Two Distinct Research Biobanks.Gloria M. Petersen & Brian Van Ness - 2015 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 43 (3):523-528.
Reconsidering the Value of Consent in Biobank Research.Judy Allen & Beverley Mcnamara - 2011 - Bioethics 25 (3):155-166.
Reconsidering Consent and Biobanking.Emma C. Bullock & Heather Widdows - 2011 - Biobanks and Tissue Research The International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology 8:111-125.
Ethics of Dead Participants: Policy Recommendations for Biobank Research.Lars Ursin & Maria Stuifbergen - 2018 - Journal of Medical Ethics 44 (10):695-699.
Reconsidering the Value of Consent in Biobank Research.Beverley Mcnamara Judy Allen - 2011 - Bioethics 25 (3):155-166.
Ethically Sustainable Governance in the Biobanking of Eggs and Embryos for Research.Kieran C. O’Doherty & Karla Stroud - 2015 - Monash Bioethics Review 33 (4):277-294.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads