Canadian Journal of Philosophy 49 (2):182-207 (2019)

Authors
Daniele Mezzadri
United Arab Emirates University
Abstract
This paper challenges a standard interpretation according to which Frege’s conception of logic (early and late) is at odds with the contemporary one, because on the latter’s view logic is formal, while on Frege’s view it is not, given that logic’s subject matter is reality’s most general features. I argue that Frege – in Begriffsschrift – retained the idea that logic is formal; Frege sees logic as providing the ‘logical cement’ that ties up together the contentful concepts of specific sciences, not the most general truths. Finally, I discuss how Frege conceives of the application of Begriffsschrift, and of its status as a ‘lingua characteristica’.
Keywords Frege, Begriffsschrift, Logic, Formality
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2019
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1080/00455091.2018.1516973
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 52,704
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Foundations of Arithmetic.Gottlob Frege - 1953 - Evanston: Ill., Northwestern University Press.
Basic Laws of Arithmetic.Gottlob Frege - 2013 - Oxford University Press.
Frege, Kant, and the Logic in Logicism.John MacFarlane - 2002 - Philosophical Review 111 (1):25-65.
What Does It Mean to Say That Logic is Formal?John MacFarlane - 2000 - Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh

View all 48 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Frege on the Generality of Logical Laws.Jim Hutchinson - 2020 - European Journal of Philosophy (2):1-18.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Frege's Begriffsschrift is Indeed First-Order Complete.Yang Liu - 2017 - History and Philosophy of Logic 38 (4):342-344.
La Primera Begriffsschrift Fregeana.Luis Segura Martínez - 1999 - Signos Filosóficos 1:13-32.
Frege and the Rigorization of Analysis.William Demopoulos - 1994 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 23 (3):225 - 245.
Function and Argument in Begriffsschrift.Calixto Badesa Cortes & Joan Bertran-San Millán - 2017 - History and Philosophy of Logic 38 (4):316-341.
What Frege's Theory of Identity is Not.Robert May - 2012 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 1 (1):41-48.
What is a Begriffsschrift?Jonathan Barnes - 2002 - Dialectica 56 (1):65-80.
What is a Begriffsschrift?Jonathan Barnes - 2002 - Dialectica 56 (1):65–80.
Lotze and Frege: The Dating of the 'Kernsätze'.Frans Hovens - 1997 - History and Philosophy of Logic 18 (1):17-31.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-09-16

Total views
151 ( #59,155 of 2,340,059 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #334,980 of 2,340,059 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes