BMC Medical Ethics 17 (1):62 (2016)

Signe Mezinska
University of Latvia
Marcin Waligora
Jagiellonian University
Conducting research during or in the aftermath of disasters poses many specific practical and ethical challenges. This is particularly the case with research involving human subjects. The extraordinary circumstances of research conducted in disaster settings require appropriate regulations to ensure the protection of human participants. The goal of this study is to systematically and qualitatively review the existing ethical guidelines for disaster research by using the constant comparative method. We performed a systematic qualitative review of disaster research ethics guidelines to collect and compare existing regulations. Guidelines were identified by a three-tiered search strategy: 1) searching databases, 2) an Internet search, and 3) a search of the references in the included documents from the first two searches. We used the constant comparative method for analysis of included guidelines. Fourteen full text guidelines were included for analysis. The included guidelines covered the period 2000-2014. Qualitative analysis of the included guidelines revealed two core themes: vulnerability and research ethics committee review. Within each of the two core themes, various categories and subcategories were identified. Some concepts and terms identified in analyzed guidelines are used in an inconsistent manner and applied in different contexts. Conceptual clarity is needed in this area as well as empirical evidence to support the statements and requirements included in analyzed guidelines.
Keywords Research ethics  Ethics guidelines  Disaster research  Disaster  Research ethics committee  Vulnerability
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1186/s12910-016-0148-7
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 60,901
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The First Casualty of an Epidemic is Evidence.Bjørn Hofmann - 2020 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 26 (5):1344-1346.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Research Ethics Committees: A Regional Approach.Cheryl Cox Macpherson - 1999 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20 (2):161-179.
Research Ethics: Beyond the Guidelines.Cheryl Cox Macpherson - 2001 - Developing World Bioethics 1 (1):57-68.


Added to PP index

Total views
23 ( #464,390 of 2,439,108 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #434,440 of 2,439,108 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes