Philosophical Explorations 4 (2):112 – 134 (2001)
We argue in favor of the adaptive value of acceptance and that it deserves a definite status within the 'positive paradigm'. Acceptance currently suffers from ambiguous connotations because of its lack of optimistic biases and its similarity to resignation. We endeavor to show that acceptance and resignation are distinct attitudes by exploring their relationships with various phenomena-frustration, disappointment, expectation, positive thinking, replanning, and accuracy. The resulting distinguishing features of acceptance-thriving versus returning to baseline; realistic optimism versus hopelessness; persistence and flexible replanning versus disengagement-are crucial for adaptive coping, and appear to be in keeping with the positive paradigm.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
References found in this work BETA
Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason.Michael Bratman - 1987 - Center for the Study of Language and Information.
Citations of this work BETA
Forgiveness: A Cognitive-Motivational Anatomy.Maria Miceli & Cristiano Castelfranchi - 2011 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 41 (3):260-290.
Similar books and articles
Hope: The Power of Wish and Possibility.Maria Miceli & Cristiano Castelfranchi - 2010 - Theory and Psychology 20 (2):251-276.
Positive Self-Regard and Authentic Morality.Paul E. Staes - 1972 - [Manila]Loyola School of Theology.
Believing, Holding True, and Accepting.Pascal Engel - 1998 - Philosophical Explorations 1 (2):140 – 151.
Adaptive Misbelief or Judicious Pragmatic Acceptance?Keith Frankish - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (6):520.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads24 ( #209,379 of 2,163,620 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #188,991 of 2,163,620 )
How can I increase my downloads?