Against Agent-Based Virtue Ethics

Philosophical Papers 33 (1):1-10 (2004)
Abstract
Abstract Agent-based virtue ethics is a unitary normative theory according to which the moral status of actions is entirely dependent upon the moral status of an agent's motives and character traits. One of the problems any such approach faces is to capture the common-sense distinction between an agent's doing the right thing, and her doing it for the right (or wrong) reason. In this paper I argue that agent-based virtue ethics ultimately fails to capture this kind of fine-grained distinction, and to this extent ought to be rejected. I focus first on Michael Slote's agent-based theory, according to which the moral status of actions depends upon an agent's actual motives, and argue that this leads to a paradox. I then consider whether the ?counterfactual? version of agent-basing favoured by Rosalind Hursthouse and Linda Zagzebski fares any better, and conclude that it does not
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/05568640409485132
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,188
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
A New Form of Agent-Based Virtue Ethics.Daniel Doviak - 2011 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (3):259-272.
Rightness and Goodness in Agent-Based Virtue Ethics.Liezl van Zyl - 2011 - Journal of Philosophical Research 36:103-114.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
A New Form of Agent-Based Virtue Ethics.Daniel Doviak - 2011 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (3):259-272.
Rightness and Goodness in Agent-Based Virtue Ethics.Liezl van Zyl - 2011 - Journal of Philosophical Research 36:103-114.
Moral Theories and Virtue Ethics.Michael Slote - 1999 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 1:51-57.
Four Solutions to the Alleged Incompleteness of Virtue Ethics.Sean McAleer - 2010 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 4 (3):1-20.
Reasons for Action: Agent-Neutral Vs. Agent-Relative.Michael Ridge - 2011 - The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Right Action and the Non-Virtuous Agent.Liezl van Zyl - 2011 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 28 (1):80-92.
Wisdom and Action Guidance in the Agent-Based Virtue Ethics of Aristotle.Thomas Sherman - 2008 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 80 (4):481 - 506.
Wisdom and Action Guidance in the Agent-Based Virtue Ethics of Aristotle.S. J. Thomas Sherman - 2006 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 80 (4):481-506.
Agent-Based Virtue Ethics.Michael Slote - 1995 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 20 (1):83-101.
Can an Act-Consequentialist Theory Be Agent Relative?Douglas W. Portmore - 2001 - American Philosophical Quarterly 38 (4):363-77.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-08-24

Total downloads

83 ( #61,159 of 2,153,860 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

11 ( #60,606 of 2,153,860 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums