History and Philosophy of Logic 24 (4):307-325 (2003)
This article outlines the work of a group of US mathematicians called the American Postulate Theorists and their influence on Tarski's work in the 1930s that was to be foundational for model theory. The American Postulate Theorists were influenced by the European foundational work of the period around 1900, such as that of Peano and Hilbert. In the period roughly from 1900???1940, they developed an indigenous American approach to foundational investigations. This made use of interpretations of precisely formulated axiomatic theories to prove such metatheoretic properties as independence, consistency, categoricity and, in some cases, completeness of axiom sets. This approach to foundations was in many respects similar to that later taken by Tarski, who frequently cites the work of American Postulate Theorists. Their work served as paradigm examples of the theories and concepts investigated in model theory. The article also examines the possibility of a more specific impetus to Tarski's model theoretic investigation, arising from his having studied in 1927???1929 a paper by C. H. Langford proving completeness for various axiom sets for linear orders. This used the method of elimination of quantifiers. The article concludes with an examination of one example of Langford's methods to indicate how their correct formulation seems to call for model-theoretic concepts
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
The Absence of Multiple Universes of Discourse in the 1936 Tarski Consequence-Definition Paper.John Corcoran & José Miguel Sagüillo - 2011 - History and Philosophy of Logic 32 (4):359 - 374.
What is Tarski's Common Concept of Consequence?Ignacio Jané - 2006 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 12 (1):1-42.
Methodological Practice and Complementary Concepts of Logical Consequence: Tarski's Model-Theoretic Consequence and Corcoran's Information-Theoretic Consequence.Jose Saguillo - 2009 - History and Philosophy of Logic 30 (1):21-48.
The Role of Universal Language in the Early Work of Carnap and Tarski.Iris Loeb - 2017 - Synthese 194 (1):15-31.
Similar books and articles
Was Tarski's Theory of Truth Motivated by Physicalism?Greg Frost-Arnold - 2004 - History and Philosophy of Logic 25 (4):265-280.
Tarski, Truth and Model Theory.Peter Milne - 1999 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 99 (2):141–167.
Some Current Problems in Metamathematics1.Alfred Tarski, Jan Tarski & Jan Woleński - 1995 - History and Philosophy of Logic 16 (2):159-168.
Tarski's Definition and Truth-Makers.Ilkka Niiniluoto - 2004 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 126 (1-3):57-76.
Logical Consequence: A Defense of Tarski.Greg Ray - 1996 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 25 (6):617 - 677.
Beltrami's Model and the Independence of the Parallel Postulate.J. Scanlan Michael - 1988 - History and Philosophy of Logic 9 (1):13-34.
Full Development of Tarski's Geometry of Solids.Rafał Gruszczyński & Andrzej Pietruszczak - 2008 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 14 (4):481-540.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads14 ( #327,050 of 2,153,830 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #279,963 of 2,153,830 )
How can I increase my downloads?