Fish Shticks: Rhetorical Questions in Stanley Fish's Doing What Comes NaturallyDoing What Comes Naturally: Change, Rhetoric, and the Practice of Theory in Literary and Legal Studies [Book Review]

Diacritics 20 (2):54 (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,569

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Stanley Fish and the Old Quarrel Between Rhetoric and Philosophy.David Roochnik - 1991 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 5 (2):225-246.
Do Lawyers Need Philosophy?Patrick Lenta - 2003 - South African Journal of Philosophy 22 (1):82-97.
The Essential Rhetoric of Law, Literature, and Liberty.Donald N. McCloskey - 1991 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 5 (2):203-223.
If You Count It, They Will Come.Stanley Fish - 2013 - Humanist Studies and the Digital Age 3 (1):11.
Consequences.Stanley Fish - 1985 - Critical Inquiry 11 (3):433-458.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-04-03

Downloads
15 (#693,083)

6 months
1 (#418,924)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references