Grading Arson

Criminal Law and Philosophy 3 (1):79-95 (2008)
Abstract
Criminalizing arson is both easy and hard. On the substantive merits, the conduct of damaging property by fire uncontroversially warrants criminal sanction. Indeed, punishment for such conduct is overdetermined, as the conduct threatens multiple harms of concern to the criminal law: both damage to property and injury to people. Yet the same multiplicity of harms or threats that makes it easy to criminalize arson (in the sense of deciding to proscribe the underlying behavior) also makes it hard to criminalize arson (in the sense of formulating the offense(s) that will address that behavior). This article asks whether adopting one or more arson offenses is the best way for criminal law to address the conduct in question, or whether that conduct is more properly conceptualized, criminalized, and punished as multiple distinct offenses
Keywords Arson  Criminal codes  Endangerment  Grading of offenses  Mischief  Property damage  Special part
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2009
DOI 10.1007/s11572-008-9058-1
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,204
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Arson and the Special Part.Kimberly Kessler Ferzan - 2008 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 3 (1):97-101.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-08-10

Total downloads

11 ( #400,729 of 2,164,272 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #348,039 of 2,164,272 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums