In Adam Carter, Emma Gordon & Benjamin Jarvis (eds.), Knowledge First,. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press (forthcoming)
The paper takes a closer look at the role of knowledge and evidence in legal theory. In particular, the paper examines a puzzle arising from the evidential standard Preponderance of the Evidence and its application in civil procedure. Legal scholars have argued since at least the 1940s that the rule of the Preponderance of the Evidence gives rise to a puzzle concerning the role of statistical evidence in judicial proceedings, sometimes referred to as the Problem of Bare Statistical Evidence. While this puzzle has led to the development of a multitude of accounts and approaches in the legal literature, I argue here that the problem can be resolved fairly straightforwardly within a knowledge-first framework.
|Keywords||Knowledge First Preponderance of the Evidence Paradox of the Gatecrasher|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Sensitivity, Causality, and Statistical Evidence in Courts of Law.Michael Blome-Tillmann - 2015 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 4 (2):102-112.
Statistical Evidence, Sensitivity, and the Legal Value of Knowledge.David Enoch, Levi Spectre & Talia Fisher - 2012 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 40 (3):197-224.
Misleading Evidence and the Dogmatism Puzzle.Ru Ye - 2016 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 94 (3):563-575.
Evidence and the Openness of Knowledge.Assaf Sharon & Levi Spectre - 2017 - Philosophical Studies 174 (4):1001-1037.
Tacit Knowledge as the Unifying Factor in Evidence Based Medicine and Clinical Judgement.Tim Thornton - 2006 - Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 1 (1):2.
What is Wrong with Statistical Evidence? The Attempts to Establish an Epistemic Deficiency.Amit Pundik - manuscript
Scientific and Legal Standards of Statistical Evidence in Toxic Tort and Discrimination Suits.Carl Cranor & Kurt Nutting - 1990 - Law and Philosophy 9 (2):115 - 156.
What Do You Do with Misleading Evidence?By Michael Veber - 2004 - Philosophical Quarterly 54 (217):557–569.
Added to index2017-03-23
Total downloads40 ( #130,770 of 2,177,988 )
Recent downloads (6 months)40 ( #6,221 of 2,177,988 )
How can I increase my downloads?