Authors
Abstract
The debate about the nature of the representational format of concepts seems to have reached an impasse. The debate faces two fundamental problems. Firstly, amodalists and modalists claim that the same empirical evidence is compatible with their views. Secondly, there is no shared understanding of what a modal or amodal format amounts to. Both camps recognize that the two formats play essential roles in higher cognition, leading to an increasing number of hybrid proposals. In this paper, I argue that the existence of those fundamental problems should make us suspicious about a modal/amodal dichotomy. Also, I suggest that hybrid approaches, as they currently stand, do not provide suitable solutions to the impasse. Instead, we should overcome the dichotomy and treat the modal/amodal distinction as a graded phenomenon. I illustrate this hypothesis with an example of a cognitive-computational model of concepts based on the Predictive Processing framework.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11097-020-09678-y
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,558
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Language of Thought.J. A. Fodor - 1978 - Critica 10 (28):140-143.
The Number Sense: How the Mind Creates Mathematics.Stanislas Dehaene - 1999 - British Journal of Educational Studies 47 (2):201-203.

View all 21 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Perceptions of Perceptual Symbols.Lawrence W. Barsalou - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (4):637-660.
The Functional Effects of Modal Versus Amodal Filling-In.Greg Davis & Jon Driver - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (6):752-753.
Representing the Impossible.Jennifer Matey - 2013 - Philosophical Psychology 26 (2):188 - 206.
Mechanisms of Modal and Amodal Interpolation.Marc K. Albert - 2007 - Psychological Review 114 (2):455-468.
Amodal or Perceptual Symbol Systems: A False Dichotomy?W. Martin Davies - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):162-163.
The Metaphysics of Overcoming—Ontological Foundations.Andrey I. Matsyna - 2017 - Dialogue and Universalism 27 (4):53-72.
Amodal Completion and Knowledge.Grace Helton & Bence Nanay - 2019 - Analysis 79 (3):415-423.
Modality, Quo Vadis?K. Sathian - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):413-414.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-06-03

Total views
7 ( #976,537 of 2,348,451 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #99,301 of 2,348,451 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes