Roadkill: Between Humans, Nonhuman Animals, and Technologies

Society and Animals 12 (4):277-298 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper has two broad objectives. First, the paper aims to treat roadkill as a topic of serious social scientific inquiry by addressing it as a cultural artifact through which various identities are played out. Thus, the paper shows how the idea of roadkill-as-food mediates contradictions and ironies in American identities concerned with hunting, technology, and relationships to nature. At a second, more abstract, level, the paper deploys the example of roadkill to suggest a par ticular approach to theorizing broader relationships between humans, nonhuman animals, and technology. This paper draws on recent developments in science and technology studies, in particular, the work of Latour and Serres , to derive a number of prepositional metaphors. The paper puts these forward tentatively as useful tools for exploring and unpicking some of the complex connections and heterogeneous relationalities between humans, animals, and the technology from which roadkill emerges

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,391

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
258 (#47,742)

6 months
1 (#451,971)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Animals, Agency and Resistance.Bob Carter & Nickie Charles - 2013 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 43 (3):322-340.
Zero-compromise veganism.Josh Milburn - 2021 - Ethics and Education 16 (3):375-391.

Add more citations

References found in this work

We Have Never Been Modern.Bruno Latour - 1993 - Harvard University Press.
The Parasite.Michel Serres - 2007 - Univ of Minnesota Press.
Organizing Modernity.John Law - 1994 - Wiley-Blackwell.
The Rhetoric of Irony.Wayne C. Booth - 1975 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 33 (3):361-363.

Add more references