The origins of the representational theory of measurement: Helmholtz, Hölder, and Russell

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 24 (2):185-206 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX


It has become customary to locate the origins of modern measurement theory in the works of Helmholtz and Hölder. If by ‘modern measurement theory’ is meant the representational theory, then this may not be an accurate assessment. Both Helmholtz and Hölder present theories of measurement which are closely related to the classical conception of measurement. Indeed, Hölder can be interpreted as bringing this conception to fulfilment in a synthesis of Euclid, Newton, and Dedekind. The first explicitly representational theory appears to have been Russell's. He rejected the traditional concept of quantity and its connection to number, making the use of number in quantitative science problematical. He solved the problem via representationalism.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,429

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What Does It Mean That “Space Can Be Transcendental Without the Axioms Being So”?: Helmholtz’s Claim in Context.Francesca Biagioli - 2014 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 45 (1):1-21.
Geometry and Measurement in Otto Hölder's Epistemology.Paola Cantù - 2013 - Philosophia Scientiae 17 (17-1):131-164.
Geometry and Measurement in Otto Hölder’s Epistemology.Paola Cantù - 2013 - Philosophia Scientiae 17 (1):131-164.
On the Representation of Error.Jeffrey Helzner - 2012 - Synthese 186 (2):601-613.


Added to PP

129 (#95,513)

6 months
9 (#87,208)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Measurement in Science.Eran Tal - 2015 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The Complementarity of Psychometrics and the Representational Theory of Measurement.Elina Vessonen - 2020 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 71 (2):415-442.
Measurement Outside the Laboratory.Marcel Boumans - 2005 - Philosophy of Science 72 (5):850-863.
Nagel’s Philosophical Development.Sander Verhaegh - 2021 - In Matthias Neuber & Adam Tamas Tuboly (eds.), Ernest Nagel: Between Naturalist Pragmatism and Logical Empiricism. Springer. pp. 43-65.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The Metaphysics of Quantity.Brent Mundy - 1987 - Philosophical Studies 51 (1):29 - 54.
A Set of Independent Axioms for Extensive Quantities.Patrick Suppes - 1951 - Portugaliae Mathematica 10 (4):163-172.
The Nature of Number.Peter Forrest & D. M. Armstrong - 1987 - Philosophical Papers 16 (3):165-186.
A Theory of Measurement.Herbert Dingle - 1950 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 1 (1):5-26.

View all 13 references / Add more references