Logos and Episteme 9 (2):199-214 (2018)

Authors
John Turri
University of Waterloo
Abstract
Understanding science requires appreciating the values it presupposes and its social context. Both the values that scientists hold and their social context can affect scientific communication. Philosophers of science have recently begun studying scientific communication, especially as it relates to public policy. Some have proposed “guiding principles for communicating scientific findings” to promote trust and objectivity. This paper contributes to this line of research in a novel way using behavioural experimentation. We report results from three experiments testing judgments about the trustworthiness, competence and objectivity of scientists. More specifically, we tested whether such judgments are affected by three factors: consulting or not consulting nonscientists, conducting research under a restrictive or non-restrictive governmental communication policy, and the source of a lab’s funding. We found that each of these factors affects ordinary judgments of trustworthiness, competence and objectivity. These findings support several recommendations that could help improve scientific communication and communication policies.
Keywords Analytic Philosophy  Contemporary Philosophy  Philosophy of Mind  values  science  trust  values in science  experimental philosophy  socially relevant philosophy of science
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 2069-0533
DOI 10.5840/logos-episteme20189215
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Using Science, Making Policy: What Should We Worry About?Eleonora Montuschi - 2017 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 7 (1):57-78.
Science, Values, and Objectivity.Peter K. Machamer & Gereon Wolters (eds.) - 2004 - University of Pittsburgh Press.
Can Scientists Be Objective?Malcolm Williams - 2006 - Social Epistemology 20 (2):163 – 180.
Values in Science: The Case of Scientific Collaboration.Kristina Rolin - 2015 - Philosophy of Science 82 (2):157-177.
The Trustworthiness of Science.Anna Ivanova - 2017 - Dialogue and Universalism 27 (3):213-220.
How Is Communication Possible?Hsin-I. Liu - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 6:51-56.
Taking Our Own Medicine: On an Experiment in Science Communication.Maja Horst - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):801-815.
Essays on the Logic of Being.Francis Samuel Haserot - 1932 - Freeport, N.Y., Books for Libraries Press.
How Is Communication Possible?: Adorno's Dialectical Philosophy of Communication.Hsin-I. Liu - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 6:51-56.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-07-16

Total views
165 ( #66,705 of 2,462,595 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
52 ( #16,544 of 2,462,595 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes