What part of Fides Quaerens don’t you Intellectum ? On the Persistent Philosophical Misunderstanding of Anselm’s Ontological Argument

Abstract

A *very* rough draft of a paper on Anselm's "ontological argument" in which I argue that the argument in the Proslogion rests on a robust notion of having "that then which nothing greater can be thought" in one's mind.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-06-13

Downloads
349 (#67,969)

6 months
94 (#72,768)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Derek A. Michaud
University of Maine

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references