The Idea of Public Reason and the Reason of State

Political Theory 36 (2):239-271 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Rawls and Schmitt are often discussed in the literature as if their conceptions of the political had nothing in common, or even referred to entirely different phenomena. In this essay, I show how these conceptions share a common space of reasons, traceable back to the idea of public reason and its development since the Middle Ages. By analysing the idea of public reason in Rawls and in Schmitt, as well as its relation to their theories of political representation, I show in what way Schmitt's concept of the political cannot be divorced from an idea of justice, while, conversely, Rawls' conception of justice cannot be divorced from a theory of the political. In that way this paper thematizes the internal relation that each theory establishes between justice and power, deliberation and decision, and consensus and disagreement.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,354

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles


Added to PP

15 (#959,295)

6 months
4 (#1,029,048)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism?Chantal Mouffe - 1999 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 66 (3):745-758.
History and Illusion in Politics.Raymond Geuss - 2003 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 65 (1):178-179.
The public use of reason.Onora O'Neill - 1986 - Political Theory 14 (4):523-551.

View all 10 references / Add more references