Bioethics 32 (5):308-313 (2018)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
The prospect of cognitive enhancement well beyond current human capacities raises worries that the fundamental equality in moral status of human beings could be undermined. Cognitive enhancement might create beings with moral status higher than persons. Yet, there is an expressibility problem of spelling out what the higher threshold in cognitive capacity would be like. Nicholas Agar has put forward the bold claim that we can show by means of inductive reasoning that indefinite cognitive enhancement will probably mark a difference in moral status. The hope is that induction can determine the plausibility of post‐personhood existence in the absence of an account of what the higher status would be like. In this article, we argue that Agar's argument fails and, more generally, that inductive reasoning has little bearing on assessing the likelihood of post‐personhood in the absence of an account of higher status. We conclude that induction cannot bypass the expressibility problem about post‐persons.
|
Keywords | cognitive enhancement induction moral status person post‐person |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1111/bioe.12437 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
View all 6 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
How Pills Undermine Skills: Moralization of Cognitive Enhancement and Causal Selection.Emilian Mihailov, Blanca Rodríguez López, Florian Cova & Ivar R. Hannikainen - 2021 - Consciousness and Cognition 91:103120.
Can We Make Wise Decisions to Modify Ourselves?Rhonda Martens - 2019 - Journal of Ethics and Emerging Technologies 29 (1):1-18.
Similar books and articles
Integration of Cognitive and Moral Enhancement.Vojin Rakic - 2012 - Filozofija I Društvo 23 (2):91-103.
The Moral Status of Post-Persons.Michael Hauskeller - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (2):76-77.
Is Agar Biased Against 'Post-Persons'?Ingmar Persson - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (2):77-78.
Extended Mind and Cognitive Enhancement: Moral Aspects of Cognitive Artifacts.Richard Heersmink - 2017 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 16 (1):17-32.
Genetic Enhancement, Post-Persons and Moral Status: A Reply to Buchanan.David DeGrazia - 2012 - Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (3):135-139.
Highlights From This Issue: The Biomedical Enhancement of Moral Status.Russell Powell - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (2):65-66.
Human Enhancement and Supra-Personal Moral Status.Thomas Douglas - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 162 (3):473-497.
From Cognitive to Moral Enhancement: A Possible Reconciliation of Religious Outlooks and the Biotechnological Creation of a Better Human.Vojin Rakic - 2012 - Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 11 (31):113-128.
Why is It Possible to Enhance Moral Status and Why Doing so is Wrong?Nicholas Agar - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (2):67-74.
Cognitive Disability and Cognitive Enhancement.Jeff Mcmahan - 2009 - Metaphilosophy 40 (3-4):582-605.
A Thomistic Appraisal of Human Enhancement Technologies.Jason T. Eberl - 2014 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 35 (4):289-310.
Cognitive Enhancement: Methods, Ethics, Regulatory Challenges. [REVIEW]Nick Bostrom - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (3):311-341.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2018-05-04
Total views
200 ( #58,102 of 2,507,001 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #119,091 of 2,507,001 )
2018-05-04
Total views
200 ( #58,102 of 2,507,001 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #119,091 of 2,507,001 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads