Gender concepts and intuitions

Canadian Journal of Philosophy 39 (4):pp. 559-583 (2009)

Authors
Mari Mikkola
Oxford University
Abstract
The gender concept woman is central to feminism but has proven to be notoriously difficult to define. Some feminist philosophers, most notably Sally Haslanger, have recently argued for revisionary analyses of the concept where it is defined pragmatically for feminist political purposes. I argue against such analyses: pragmatically revising woman may not best serve feminist goals and doing so is unnecessary. Instead, focusing on certain intuitive uses of the term ‘woman’ enables feminist philosophers to make sense of it.
Keywords Contemporary Philosophy  General Interest
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0045-5091
DOI 10.1353/cjp.0.0060
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 47,149
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Ontology and Social Construction.Sally Haslanger - 1995 - Philosophical Topics 23 (2):95-125.
Gender and Race.Jennifer Saul - 2006 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 80 (1):119-143.

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Gender as a Historical Kind: A Tale of Two Genders?Marion Godman - 2018 - Biology and Philosophy 33 (3-4):21.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-01-23

Total views
392 ( #15,113 of 2,289,314 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
31 ( #28,384 of 2,289,314 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature