In Konrad Talmont-Kaminski & Marcin Miłkowski (eds.), Beyond Description. Naturalism and Normativity (2010)
The standard objection against naturalised epistemology is that it cannot account for normativity in epistemology (Putnam 1982; Kim 1988). There are different ways to deal with it. One of the obvious ways is to say that the objection misses the point: It is not a bug; it is a feature, as there is nothing interesting in normative principles in epistemology. Normative epistemology deals with norms but they are of no use in prac-tice. They are far too general to be guiding principles of research, up to the point that they even seem vacuous (see Knowles 2003). In this chapter, my strategy will be different and more in spirit of the founding father of naturalized epistemology, Quine, though not faithful to the letter. I focus on methodological prescriptions supplied by cogni-tive science in re-engineering of cognitive architectures. Engineering norms based on mechanism design weren’t treated as seriously as they should in epistemology, and that is why I will develop a sketch of a framework for researching them, starting from analysing cognitive sci-ence as engineering in section 3, then showing functional normativity in section 4, to eventually present functional engineering models of cogni-tive mechanisms as normative in section 5. Yet before showing the kind of engineering normativity specific for these prescriptions, it is worth-while to review briefly the role of normative methodology and the levels of norm complexity in it, and show how it follows Quine’s steps.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Naturalizm bez normatywności? Głos w obronie epistemologii znaturalizowanej.Barbara Trybulec - 2008 - Filozofia Nauki 2.
Epistemological Naturalism and the Normativity Objection or From Normativity to Constitutivity.Mikael Janvid - 2004 - Erkenntnis 60 (1):35-49.
Epistemological Naturalism and the Normativity Objection.M. Janvid - 2004 - Erkenntnis 60 (1):35-49.
The Philosophy of Normativity, or How to Try Clearing Things Up a Little.Christine Tappolet & Alan Voizard - 2011 - Dialogue 50 (02):233-238.
Beyond Description. Naturalism and Normativity.Konrad Talmont-Kaminski & Marcin Miłkowski (eds.) - 2010 - College Publications.
Is 'Normative Naturalism' an Oxymoron?Ellen R. Klein - 1992 - Philosophical Psychology 5 (3):287 – 297.
Generalizing and Normalizing Quine's Epistemology.Cheng-Hung Tsai - 2002 - Philosophical Writings 19:3-21.
Normative Epistemology and Naturalized Epistemology.Harold I. Brown - 1988 - Inquiry 31 (1):53 – 78.
Naturalized Epistemology and Epistemic Evaluation.Christopher Hookway - 1994 - Inquiry 37 (4):465 – 485.
Having It All: Naturalized Normativity in Feminist Science Studies.Sharyn Clough - 2004 - Hypatia 19 (1):102-118.
Closing the Gap Between Ideal and Real Behavior: Scientific Vs. Engineering Approaches to Normativity.Sergei Gepshtein - 2009 - Philosophical Psychology 22 (1):61 – 75.
Naturalistic Epistemology for Eliminative Materialists.A. Rosenberg - 1999 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (2):335-358.
Added to index2010-09-20
Total downloads34 ( #144,765 of 2,143,902 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #91,534 of 2,143,902 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.