The Birth of quantum logic

History and Philosophy of Logic 28 (2):107-122 (2007)
Abstract
By quoting extensively from unpublished letters written by John von Neumann to Garret Birkhoff during the preparatory phase (in 1935) of their ground-breaking 1936 paper that established quantum logic, the main steps in the thought process leading to the 1936 Birkhoff?von Neumann paper are reconstructed. The reconstruction makes it clear why Birkhoff and von Neumann rejected the notion of quantum logic as the projection lattice of an infinite dimensional complex Hilbert space and why they postulated in their 1936 paper that the quantum propositional system should be isomorphic to an abstract projective geometry. Looking at the paper now I see, that I forgot to say this, which should be said somewhere in the first ?: That while common logics did apply to quantum mechanics, if the notion of simultaneous measurability is introduced as an auxiliary notion, we wished to construct a logical system, which applies directly to quantum mechanics ? without any extraneous secondary notions like simultaneous measurability. And in order to have such a consequent, one-piece system of logics, we must change the classical class calculus of logics. (J. von Neumann to G. Birkhoff, November 21, 1935)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/01445340601113955
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,300
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Handbook of Philosophical Logic.Dov Gabbay & Franz Guenthner (eds.) - 1989 - Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Why John von Neumann Did Not Like the Hilbert Space Formalism of Quantum Mechanics (and What He Liked Instead).Miklos Rédei - 1996 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 27 (4):493-510.

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Only If 'Acrobatic Logic' is Non-Boolean.Slawomir Bugajski - 1980 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:264 - 271.
A New Approach to Quantum Logic.J. L. Bell - 1986 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 37 (1):83-99.
Quantum Logic and the Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics.R. I. G. Hughes - 1980 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:55 - 67.
Quantum Logic is Alive ∧ (It is True ∨ It is False).Michael Dickson - 2001 - Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2001 (3):S274 - S287.
Quantum Disjunctive Facts.James H. McGrath - 1986 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:76 - 86.
Only If Quanta Had Logic.James H. McGrath - 1978 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1978:268 - 275.
Facets of Quantum Logic.Miklós Rédei - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 32 (1):101-111.
Quantum Logic, Realism, and Value Definiteness.Allen Stairs - 1983 - Philosophy of Science 50 (4):578-602.
Added to PP index
2010-08-10

Total downloads
20 ( #254,049 of 2,193,232 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #290,647 of 2,193,232 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature