History and Philosophy of Logic 28 (2):107-122 (2007)
By quoting extensively from unpublished letters written by John von Neumann to Garret Birkhoff during the preparatory phase (in 1935) of their ground-breaking 1936 paper that established quantum logic, the main steps in the thought process leading to the 1936 Birkhoff?von Neumann paper are reconstructed. The reconstruction makes it clear why Birkhoff and von Neumann rejected the notion of quantum logic as the projection lattice of an infinite dimensional complex Hilbert space and why they postulated in their 1936 paper that the quantum propositional system should be isomorphic to an abstract projective geometry. Looking at the paper now I see, that I forgot to say this, which should be said somewhere in the first ?: That while common logics did apply to quantum mechanics, if the notion of simultaneous measurability is introduced as an auxiliary notion, we wished to construct a logical system, which applies directly to quantum mechanics ? without any extraneous secondary notions like simultaneous measurability. And in order to have such a consequent, one-piece system of logics, we must change the classical class calculus of logics. (J. von Neumann to G. Birkhoff, November 21, 1935)
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Handbook of Philosophical Logic.Dov Gabbay & Franz Guenthner (eds.) - 1989 - Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Why John von Neumann Did Not Like the Hilbert Space Formalism of Quantum Mechanics (and What He Liked Instead).Miklos Rédei - 1996 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 27 (4):493-510.
John von Neumann and the Foundations of Quantum Physics.Miklós Rédei, Michael Stöltzner, Walter Thirring, Ulrich Majer & Jeffrey Bub - 2001 - Springer Verlag.
Citations of this work BETA
Hilbert's 6th Problem and Axiomatic Quantum Field Theory.Miklós Rédei - 2014 - Perspectives on Science 22 (1):80-97.
Editors' Introduction: The Third Life of Quantum Logic: Quantum Logic Inspired by Quantum Computing. [REVIEW]J. Michael Dunn, Lawrence S. Moss & Zhenghan Wang - 2013 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 42 (3):443-459.
The Quasi-Lattice of Indiscernible Elements.Cunha do Nascimento Mauri, Krause Décio & de Araújo Feitosa Hércules - 2011 - Studia Logica 97 (1):101-126.
Similar books and articles
Only If 'Acrobatic Logic' is Non-Boolean.Slawomir Bugajski - 1980 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:264 - 271.
Facets of Quantum Logic.Miklós Rédei - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 32 (1):101-111.
Only If Quanta Had Logic.James H. McGrath - 1978 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1978:268 - 275.
Quantum Disjunctive Facts.James H. McGrath - 1986 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:76 - 86.
Quantum Logic is Alive ∧ (It is True ∨ It is False).Michael Dickson - 2001 - Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2001 (3):S274 - S287.
Quantum Logic and the Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics.R. I. G. Hughes - 1980 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:55 - 67.
A New Approach to Quantum Logic.J. L. Bell - 1986 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 37 (1):83-99.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads20 ( #246,003 of 2,164,236 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #348,017 of 2,164,236 )
How can I increase my downloads?