Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 21 (3):569-584 (2018)

Authors
Per-Erik Milam
University of California, San Diego (PhD)
Abstract
It is often claimed both that forgiveness is elective and that forgiveness is something that we do for reasons. However, there is a tension between these two central claims about the nature of forgiveness. If forgiving is something one does for reasons, then, at least sometimes, those reasons may generate a requirement to forgive or withhold forgiveness. While not strictly inconsistent with electivity, the idea of required forgiveness strikes some as antithetical to the spirit of the concept. They argue that forgiveness is essentially elective. In this paper, I dispute these arguments. I argue that the intuitive plausibility of the position diminishes upon reflection and that the best arguments fail to explain why reasons to forgive, unlike most other reasons for action, cannot generate requirements.
Keywords forgiveness  reasons  blame  elective  moral obligation
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s10677-018-9899-1
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 60,920
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Moral Saints.Susan Wolf - 1982 - Journal of Philosophy 79 (8):419-439.
Moral Blame and Moral Protest.Angela Smith - 2013 - In D. Justin Coates & Neal A. Tognazzini (eds.), Blame: Its Nature and Norms. Oxford University Press.
Forgiveness and Love.Glen Pettigrove - 2012 - Oxford University Press.

View all 38 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Oppression, Forgiveness, and Ceasing to Blame.Per-Erik Milam & Luke Brunning - 2018 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 14 (2).
Is There a Right to Be Forgiven?Luke Maring - 2020 - Philosophia (3):1-15.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Can the Paradox of Forgiveness Be Dissolved?Oliver Hallich - 2013 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (5):999-1017.
How is Self-Forgiveness Possible?Per-Erik Milam - 2017 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 98 (1).
Supererogatory Forgiveness.Espen Gamlund - 2010 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 53 (6):540-564.
Forgiveness and the Limits of Duty.Archer Alfred - 2017 - Etica and Politica/ Ethics and Politics 19 (1):225-244.
Self‐Forgiveness and Forgiveness.Zenon Szablowinski - 2012 - Heythrop Journal 53 (4):678-689.
Analytic’ Reading, ‘Continental’ Text: The Case of Derrida’s ‘on Forgiveness.Chris Kaposy - 2005 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 13 (2):203 – 226.
For Community's Sake: A (Self-Respecting) Kantian Account of Forgiveness.Kate A. Moran - forthcoming - Proceedings of the XI International Kant-Kongress.
The Impossible Demand of Forgiveness.Steven Gormley - 2014 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 22 (1):27-48.
The Nature and Limits of Forgiveness.Alice MacLachlan - 2008 - Dissertation, Boston University
Forgiveness, Resentment, and Self-Respect.Shelby Therese Weitzel - 2002 - Dissertation, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
A Feminist Ethic of Forgiveness.Kathryn J. Norlock - 2001 - Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin - Madison
Forgiveness Without Blame.Espen Gamlund - 2011 - In Christel Fricke (ed.), The Ethics of Forgiveness. Routledge.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-05-28

Total views
58 ( #179,303 of 2,439,305 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #82,661 of 2,439,305 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes