Abstract
ABSTRACT Certain problems in commonsense reasoning lend themselves to the use of non-standard formalisms which we call active logics. Among these are problems of objects misidentification. In this paper we describe some technical issues connected with automated inference in active logics, using particular object misidentification problems as illustrations. Control of exponential growth of inferences is a key issue. To control this growth attention is paid to a limited version of an inference rule for negative introspection. We also present some descriptive statistics for comparison with earlier active-logic approaches
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/11663081.1996.10510864
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,391
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Language of Thought.Jerry A. Fodor - 1975 - Harvard University Press.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Maximality and Refutability.Tom Skura - 2004 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 45 (2):65-72.
Unification and Passive Inference Rules for Modal Logics.V. V. Rybakov, M. Terziler & C. Gencer - 2000 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 10 (3-4):369-377.
What is an Inference Rule?Ronald Fagin, Joseph Y. Halpern & Moshe Y. Vardi - 1992 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 57 (3):1018-1045.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-11-24

Total views
10 ( #800,178 of 2,326,143 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #284,939 of 2,326,143 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes