A reply to 'some new aspects of relativity: Comments on Zahar's paper'

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 29 (3):252-256 (1978)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/bjps/29.3.252-b

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Reply to Gale and Pruss.John F. Post - 2004 - Philo 7 (1):114-121.
Some new aspects of relativity: Remarks on Zahar's paper.M. F. Podlaha - 1976 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 27 (3):261-267.
Einstein's debt to lorentz: A reply to Feyerabend and Miller.Elie Zahar - 1978 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 29 (1):49-60.
Could Lakatos, even with Zahar's criterion for novel fact, evaluate the copernican research programme?Neil Thomason - 1992 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 43 (2):161-200.
Comments on comments on comments: A reply to Margenau and Wigner.Hilary Putnam - 1964 - Philosophy of Science 31 (1):1-6.
Second thoughts about Machian positivism: A reply to Feyerabend.Elie Zahar - 1981 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 32 (3):267-276.
Remarks on Grandi’s Comments.Daniel E. Flage - 2009 - Philosophia 37 (3):379-380.
Remarks on McCormick’s Comments.Walter Ott - 2009 - Philosophia 37 (3):475-476.
The Historiography of Special Relativity: Comments on the Papers by John Earman, Clark Glymour, and Robert Rynasiewicz and by Arthur Miller.Kenneth F. Schaffner - 1982 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:417 - 428.
Theory of relativity.Wolfgang Pauli - 1958 - New York,: Pergamon Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
16 (#886,588)

6 months
1 (#1,516,429)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Why did Einstein's programme supersede lorentz's? (I).Elie Zahar - 1973 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 24 (2):95-123.
The Theory of Relativity.L. Silberstein - 1916 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 81:394-395.
On lorentz's methodology.Arthur I. Miller - 1974 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25 (1):29-45.
Some new aspects of relativity: Remarks on Zahar's paper.M. F. Podlaha - 1976 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 27 (3):261-267.

Add more references