At the Centre of Kierkegaard: An objective absurdity

Religious Studies 33 (4):433-441 (1997)

Abstract
No one doubts that Kierkegaard's Concluding Unscientific Postscript is one of the most important, one of the most artistically contrived, and certainly one of the wittiest works in the history of philosophy. Further, the Postscript has often been accorded a kind of centrality in the Kierkegaardian corpus. Kierkegaard himself seems to have assigned it some such role. He informs the reader in the ‘First and Last Declaration’ that he originally intended the Postscript to be his last word before retiring from his authorship . In The Point of View for My Work as an Author he himself calls it both ‘the turning-point’ and ‘the middle point’ in the sense that ‘this work concerns itself with and sets “the Problem”, which is the problem of the whole authorship: how to become a Christian’. Aside from the way in which Kierkegaard may have conceived the Postscript as being central or pivotal to his whole enterprise, certainly scholars have sometimes treated the Postscript as, at least in some ways, his magnum opus and summum verbum – as I would also. But our concern here is not with the centrality of the Postscript but with the centrality within the Postscript. Most everyone would, I think, acknowledge that a central section of the Postscript may be identified, though I would go farther and claim that within this a central, pivotal, solitary statement may be identified
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0034412597004071
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 43,822
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Kierkegaard on Truth.Matthew Gerhard Jacoby - 2002 - Religious Studies 38 (1):27-44.
Absurdity, Incongruity and Laughter.Bob Plant - 2009 - Philosophy 84 (1):111-134.
Sartre’s View of Kierkegaard as Transhistorical Man.Antony Aumann - 2006 - Journal of Philosophical Research 31:361-372.
Moore’s Paradox and the Priority of Belief Thesis.John N. Williams - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 165 (3):1117-1138.
Absurdity as Unary Operator.Sergei P. Odintsov - 2006 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 91 (1):225-242.
Moore’s Paradoxes and Iterated Belief.John N. Williams - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Research 32:145-168.
I. Salvation: A Reply to Harrison Hall's Reading of Kierkegaard.Gordon D. Marino - 1985 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 28 (1-4):441-449.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-03-25

Total views
4 ( #1,096,024 of 2,265,046 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #860,568 of 2,265,046 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature