Anti-Luck Virtue Epistemology as Religious Epistemology: A Response to Bobier

Philosophia 43 (2):427-434 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In a recent paper, Christopher Bobier has argued that Duncan Pritchard’s Anti-Luck Virtue Epistemology cannot account for knowledge that we have through Divine Revelation. This gives philosophers who believe that Divine Revelation can be source of knowledge reason to reject ALVE. Bobier’s arguments are specifically against ALVE, but they serve as arguments against all sorts of virtue epistemologies. In this paper then, I will critically examine Bobier’s argument, and contend that virtue epistemologies are compatible with knowledge through Divine Revelation

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,211

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-03-21

Downloads
44 (#563,553)

6 months
5 (#853,286)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Joe Milburn
Universidad de Navarra

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Anti-Luck Virtue Epistemology.Duncan Pritchard - 2012 - Journal of Philosophy 109 (3):247-279.
Knowledge and credit.Jennifer Lackey - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 142 (1):27 - 42.
Safety-Based Epistemology: Wither Now?Duncan Pritchard - 2009 - Journal of Philosophical Research 34:33-45.

View all 6 references / Add more references