Another view of translation manuals and the study of science

Synthese 113 (2):171-193 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The article argues for the possibility of translation manuals having an implicit internal structure. This structure is composed of specific methodological assumptions and techniques. Using the (N)-type and (G)-type distinction developed by Fuller for the study of scientific behavior, it is shown that these are incomplete characterizations of translation manuals. A more complete characterization must involve an analysis of how the presence or absence of methodological rules influences the interpretation of specific research questions. It is further argued that while Quine's original indeterminacy thesis cannot be completely rejected, in some cases it can be modified to reflect the importance of the methodological constraints. Finally, it is suggested that the more critical analysis of translation manuals will benefit the on-going debates in the study of scientific behavior.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,283

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Kripkenstein: Rule and Indeterminacy.Xin Sheen Liu - 1998 - The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 32:67-75.
On Davidson and interpretation.Howard Burdick - 1989 - Synthese 80 (3):321 - 345.
Handbook of quantitative studies of science and technology.A. F. J. van Raan (ed.) - 1988 - New York, N.Y., U.S.A.: Sole distributors for the U.S.A. and Canada, Elsevier Science Pub. Co..
Guide to the Thought of Lucius Annaeus Seneca.Anna Lydia Motto - 1970 - Amsterdam: A. M. Hakkert. Edited by Lucius Annaeus Seneca.


Added to PP

50 (#319,955)

6 months
5 (#648,432)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Studies in the way of words.Herbert Paul Grice - 1989 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Knowledge and social imagery.David Bloor - 1976 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ontological relativity.W. V. O. Quine - 1968 - Journal of Philosophy 65 (7):185-212.
Knowledge and Social Imagery.David Bloor - 1979 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 30 (2):195-199.

View all 16 references / Add more references