Politics, Philosophy and Economics 9 (1):47-66 (2010)
In this article, I argue that the reading of Mill that D.G. Brown presents in ‘Mill’s Moral Theory: Ongoing Revisionism’ is inconsistent with several key passages in Mill’s writings. I also show that a rule-utilitarian interpretation that is very close to the one developed by David Lyons is able to account for these passages without difficulty
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Hutcheson's Deceptive Hedonism.Dale Dorsey - 2010 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (4):445-467.
Mill's Moral Theory: Ongoing Revisionism.D. G. Brown - 2010 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 9 (1):5-45.
J.S. Mill and the Diversity of Utilitarianism.Daniel Jacobson - 2003 - Philosophers' Imprint 3 (2):1-18.
Rules and Their Reasons: Mill on Morality and Instrumental Rationality.Ben Eggleston - 2011 - In Ben Eggleston, Dale E. Miller & David Weinstein (eds.), John Stuart Mill and the Art of Life. Oxford University Press. pp. 71-93.
Moral Rules and J. S. Mill's Educational Mandate.Ki Su Kim - 1988 - Journal of Moral Education 17 (2):105-113.
The Significance of Tendencies and Intentions in the Moral Philosophy of J. S. Mill.Ville Kilkku - 2004 - Utilitas 16 (1):80-95.
David Lyons, Rights, Welfare, and Mill's Moral Theory, New York, Oxford University Press, 1994, Pp. 224;Necip Fikri Alican, Mill's Principle of Utility: A Defense of John Stuart Mill's Notorious Proof, Amsterdam, Rodopi B.V. Editions, 1994, Pp. Xv + 240. [REVIEW]G. W. Smith - 1996 - Utilitas 8 (1):127.
Autonomy, Slavery, and Mill's Critique of Paternalism.Alan E. Fuchs - 2001 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 4 (3):231-251.
Added to index2010-01-30
Total downloads26 ( #194,953 of 2,164,552 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #188,486 of 2,164,552 )
How can I increase my downloads?