Causation in Personal Injury Law: The Case for a Probabilistic Approach [Book Review]

Topoi 33 (2):1-12 (2014)

This paper makes the case for a wider acceptance of a probabilistic approach to causation in negligence. This acceptance would help to remove much of the incoherence which has come to afflict the English law of personal injury law. This incoherence can also be found in other common law jurisdictions (notably those of the United States, Canada and Australia). Concentrating upon recent UK case law, the argument opposes the contention that ‘naked statistics’ can play no role in establishing causation. The argument is controversial but it can be reduced to three unremarkable grounds: (1) With its acceptance (albeit in certain carefully prescribed circumstances) of liability for a negligently increased risk which has eventuated, the common law has already embraced a probabilistic conception of causation; (2) The English common law already employs a probabilistic (frequentist) approach to identifying coincidences; and (3) With the ‘balance of probabilities’ as the standard of proof in civil cases, the common law has long had a probabilistic (epistemic) concept at its core. Probabilistic approaches (at both the type and token level) are shown to be consistent with laypersons’ understanding of the concepts such as risk, chance, odds and likelihood. Moreover, a wider acceptance of a probabilistic perspective on causation would entail no major challenge to the fundamental aims of tort, viz. deterrence and corrective justice
Keywords Causation  Law  Counterfactuals  Probability  Personal injury  Risk  Chance  Coincidence
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11245-013-9181-z
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 46,483
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Philosophical Papers.David K. Lewis - 1983 - Oxford University Press.
Physical Causation.Phil Dowe - 2000 - Cambridge University Press.
Physical Causation.Phil Dowe - 2002 - Erkenntnis 56 (2):258-263.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Probabilistic Analysis of Causation.Luke Glynn - 2011 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62 (2):343-392.
Probabilistic Causation.Christopher Hitchcock - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Probabilistic Causality and Multiple Causation.Paul Humphreys - 1980 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:25 - 37.
Metaphysics and Conceptual Analysis: Lewis on Indeterministic Causation.Michael McDermott - 1997 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 75 (3):396 – 403.
Causation: Probabilistic and Counterfactual Analyses.Igal Kvart - 2004 - In Ned Hall, L. A. Paul & John Collins (eds.), Causation and Counterfactuals. Cambridge: Mass.: Mit Press. pp. 359--387.
Causation: Counterfactual and Probabilistic Analyses.Igal Kvart - 2004 - In J. D. Collins, E. J. Hall & L. A. Paul (eds.), Causation and Counterfactuals. MIT Press.
General Causation.John W. Carroll - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:311 - 317.


Added to PP index

Total views
34 ( #269,859 of 2,286,546 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #862,224 of 2,286,546 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature