Does "belief holism" show that reductive dispositionalism about content could not be true?

Authors
Alexander Miller
New York University
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords Belief  Content  Epistemology  Holism  Boghossian, P
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 35,010
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Hindriks on Rule-Following.Jussi Haukioja - 2005 - Philosophical Studies 126 (2):219-239.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Meaning Holism and Intentional Content.Arnold Silverberg - 1994 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 75 (1):29-53.
Ruritania Revisited.Ned Block - 1995 - Philosophical Issues 6:171-187.
Is Content Holism Incoherent?Kirk A. Ludwig - 1993 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 46:173-195.
An Argument for Holism.Ned Block - 1994 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 95:151-70.
Objective Content.Alan Weir - 2003 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 77 (77):47-72.
Objective Content.Miller Alexander - 2003 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 77 (1):73–90.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
0

Recent downloads (6 months)
0

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes

Sign in to use this feature