Synthese 82 (1):23 - 52 (1990)
This paper is a detailed critical study of Adolf Grünbaum's work on the Duhemian thesis. I show that (a) Grünbaum's geometrical counterexample to the (D1) subthesis is unsuccessful, even with minimal claims made for what the counterexample is supposed to show, and (b) the (D2) subthesis is not a reasonable one (and cannot correctly be attributed to Duhem). The paper concludes with an argument about the relation between the Duhemian thesis, concerning component hypotheses of a scientific theory, and the view that it is impossible to falsify entire theories conclusively.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge.Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.) - 1970 - Cambridge University Press.
The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory.Pierre Maurice Marie Duhem - 1954 - Princeton: Princeton University Press.
The Foundations of Psychoanalysis: A Philosophical Critique.Adolf Grünbaum - 1984 - University of California Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Analytic and the Synthetic. The Duhemian Argument and Some Contemporary Philosophers.George Krzywicki Herburt - 1959 - Philosophy of Science 26 (2):104-113.
Duhem, Quine and Grünbaum on Falsification.Gary Wedeking - 1969 - Philosophy of Science 36 (4):375-380.
On the Conclusive Falsification of Scientific Hypotheses.Robert Barrett - 1969 - Philosophy of Science 36 (4):363-374.
Contextual Falsification and Scientific Methodology.Jarrett Leplin - 1972 - Philosophy of Science 39 (4):476-490.
Grünbaum's 'Defense' of the Symmetry Thesis.James H. Fetzer - 1974 - Philosophical Studies 25 (3):173 - 187.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads34 ( #153,116 of 2,178,208 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #316,504 of 2,178,208 )
How can I increase my downloads?