Frege's Puzzle for Perception

Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 93 (2):368-392 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

According to an influential variety of the representational view of perceptual experience—the singular content view—the contents of perceptual experiences include singular propositions partly composed of the particular physical object a given experience is about or of. The singular content view faces well-known difficulties accommodating hallucinations; I maintain that there is also an analogue of Frege's puzzle that poses a significant problem for this view. In fact, I believe that this puzzle presents difficulties for the theory that are unique to perception in that strategies that have been developed to respond to Frege's puzzle in the case of belief cannot be employed successfully in the case of perception. Ultimately, I maintain that this perceptual analogue of Frege's puzzle provides a compelling reason to reject the singular content view of perceptual experience.

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-10-26

Downloads
1,121 (#16,975)

6 months
137 (#34,726)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Boyd Millar
Trent University

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind.John R. Searle - 1983 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
The character of consciousness.David John Chalmers - 2010 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The representational character of experience.David Chalmers - 2004 - In Brian Leiter (ed.), The future for philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 153--181.
The Contents of Visual Experience.Susanna Siegel - 2010 - , US: Oxford University Press USA.

View all 58 references / Add more references