Grounding human rights

This paper examines the idea of human rights, and how they should be justified. It begins by reviewing Peter Jones?s claim that the purpose of human rights is to allow people from different cultural backgrounds to live together as equals, and suggests that this by itself provides too slender a basis. Instead it proposes that human rights should be grounded on human needs. Three difficulties with this proposal are considered. The first is the problem of whether needs are sufficiently objective for this purpose, to which it responds by drawing a distinction between human needs proper and societal needs. The second is the problem of overshoot: human needs are more expansive than human rights. It responds to this by arguing that where needs conflict, we make trade-offs before specifying the optimum set of human rights. The third is the problem of undershoot: needs cannot be used to ground civil and political rights. Here it suggests that some of these rights can be grounded directly in needs, others can be justified instrumentally, and yet others grounded in the human need for recognition. Finally the paper returns to Jones, and asks which approach to human rights is better able to justify them within both liberal and non-liberal cultures
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/13698230.2012.699396
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 24,479
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Albert Weale (2012). The Right to Health Versus Good Medical Care? Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 15 (4):473-493.

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Stephanie J. Silverman (2014). Detaining Immigrants and Asylum Seekers: A Normative Introduction. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 17 (5):600-617.
John Horton (2012). Why Liberals Should Not Worry About Subsidizing Opera. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 15 (4):429-448.
Massimo Renzo (2015). Human Rights and the Priority of the Moral. Social Philosophy and Policy 32 (1):127-148.
Hillel Steiner (2012). Human Rights and the Diversity of Value. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 15 (4):395-406.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Doris Schroeder (2012). Human Rights and Human Dignity. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (3):323-335.
Louis Henkin (1998). Religion, Religions, and Human Rights. Journal of Religious Ethics 26 (2):229-239.
Charles Jones (2013). The Human Right to Subsistence. Journal of Applied Philosophy 30 (1):57-72.
Joseph Raz (2010). Human Rights Without Foundations. In J. Tasioulas & S. Besson (eds.), The Philosphy of International Law. Oxford University Press.
Amartya Sen (2012). The Global Reach of Human Rights. Journal of Applied Philosophy 29 (2):91-100.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

53 ( #92,164 of 1,925,592 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

4 ( #212,047 of 1,925,592 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.