In defense of proper functions

Philosophy of Science 56 (June):288-302 (1989)
Abstract
I defend the historical definition of "function" originally given in my Language, Thought and Other Biological Categories (1984a). The definition was not offered in the spirit of conceptual analysis but is more akin to a theoretical definition of "function". A major theme is that nonhistorical analyses of "function" fail to deal adequately with items that are not capable of performing their functions
Keywords Definition  Function  History  Language
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/289488
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 24,965
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
The Psychology of Folk Psychology.A. Goldman - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (1):15-28.
Epistemic Entitlement.Peter J. Graham - 2012 - Noûs 46 (3):449-482.
An Organizational Account of Biological Functions.Matteo Mossio, Cristian Saborido & Alvaro Moreno - 2009 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (4):813-841.
The Epistemic Force of Perceptual Experience.Susanna Schellenberg - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 170 (1):87-100.

View all 177 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

468 ( #3,438 of 2,030,289 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

16 ( #38,405 of 2,030,289 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums