Philosophy of Science 56 (June):288-302 (1989)
I defend the historical definition of "function" originally given in my Language, Thought and Other Biological Categories (1984a). The definition was not offered in the spirit of conceptual analysis but is more akin to a theoretical definition of "function". A major theme is that nonhistorical analyses of "function" fail to deal adequately with items that are not capable of performing their functions
|Keywords||Definition Function History Language|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
How We Know Our Minds: The Illusion of First-Person Knowledge of Intentionality.Alison Gopnik - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (1):1.
An Organizational Account of Biological Functions.Matteo Mossio, Cristian Saborido & Alvaro Moreno - 2009 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (4):813-841.
The Epistemic Force of Perceptual Experience.Susanna Schellenberg - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 170 (1):87-100.
Similar books and articles
Language, Thought and Other Biological Categories.Ruth G. Millikan - 1984 - MIT Press.
Proper Environment and the SEP Account of Biological Function.Michael Bertrand - 2013 - Synthese 190 (9):1503-1517.
Fitness and Function.D. M. Walsh - 1996 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (4):553-574.
Defining Mental Disorder. Exploring the 'Natural Function' Approach.Somogy Varga - 2011 - Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 6 (1):1-.
Functions as Selected Effects: The Conceptual Analyst's Defense.Karen Neander - 1991 - Philosophy of Science 58 (2):168-184.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads468 ( #3,438 of 2,030,289 )
Recent downloads (6 months)16 ( #38,405 of 2,030,289 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.