Bioethics 26 (9):501-503 (2012)

Authors
Kate Chatfield
University of Central Lancashire
Abstract
In this short response we show that Kevin Smith's moral and ethical rejections of homeopathy1 are fallacious and rest on questionable epistemology. Further, we suggest Smith's presumption of a utilitarian stance is an example of scientism encroaching into medicine
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2012.01948.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 72,607
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Scientism and Pseudoscience: A Philosophical Commentary.Massimo Pigliucci - 2015 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 12 (4):569-575.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-04-18

Total views
172 ( #70,227 of 2,533,661 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #389,210 of 2,533,661 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes